JOSHUA CAMERON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2001-02-21
No. 2D00-4268
WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.
788 So. 2d 297 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Cameron appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying Cameron relief without prejudice to any right Cameron might have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Pro cedure 3.850. See Murphy v. State, 773 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cameron v. State, 792 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
    …of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The motion was denied because the sentence did not constitute a departure under the 1994 guidelines. On appeal, this court affirmed without prejudice to Cameron’s filing for relief under rule 3.850. Cameron v. State, 788 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Cameron then filed essentially the same motion but cited rule 3.850. Cameron did not seek to withdraw his plea. The trial court denied the motion, finding that it raised the same claim as the rule 3.800(a) motion, which had bee…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw