STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
CALVIN HARRIS, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
CALVIN HARRIS, RESPONDENT
788 So. 2d 955
Florida Supreme Court (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, J.
We have for review Harris v. State, 764 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We partially quash the decision of the district court below only as it relates to the petitioner’s sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2000). We approve the determination of the Fourth District with regard to Harris’s conviction.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. J.P., 907 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 2004)…Florida “strict scrutiny applies when reviewing a juvenile curfew ordinance.” T.M., 784 So. 2d at 444; see also J.P., 788 So. 2d at 953; R.J.H. v. State, 788 So. 2d 952, 952 (Fla.2001); J.A. v. State, 788 So. 2d 953, 954 (Fla.2001); D.N.S. v. State, 788 So. 2d 955, 955 (Fla.2001); M.R. v. State, 788 So. 2d 957, 958 (Fla.2001).1 This Court recognizes that foreign jurisdictions addressing the constitutionality of juvenile curfew ordinances have incorporated the minors’ status into the equal protection framewor…
-
Harris v. State, 790 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…consider the issue raised on appeal in light of Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2000). See State v. Harris, 788 So. 2d 955 (Fla.2001). Upon reconsideration, we now hold that the Defendant’s sentence under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act and the Habitual Violent Felony Offender Act was not a double jeopardy violation. However, the trial court erred in sentencin…
-
D.N.S. v. State, 832 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…1996). She argues that the ordinance is unconstitutional. This court previously rejected her argument and affirmed the trial court’s determination that the ordinance was constitutional. See D.N.S. v. State, 772 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), quashed, 788 So. 2d 955 (Fla.2001). In affirming the trial court, this court applied the heightened scrutiny test. See State v. T.M., 761 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), quashed, 784 So. 2d 442 (Fla.2001). However, this court also certified two questions to the Florida Sup…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000)
- State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000)
- Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000)
- McKNIGHT v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2000)
- Harris v. State, 764 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)