STANLEY RAY ROGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2001-06-06
No. 4D01-1384
POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
788 So. 2d 1083 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Stanley Ray Rogers’ second motion to correct illegal sentence. That motion made the same challenge to his sentence that was raised and rejected in his direct appeal and in his first motion to correct illegal sentence. Rogers v. State, 743 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Rogers v. State, 694 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The trial court properly found that his latest motion was procedurally barred.

This latest appeal constitutes an abuse of the judicial system. We hereby prohibit Rogers from filing any pro se petition or appeal in this court that raises this same issue. If he violates this prohibition, he will face sanctions. See Prince v. State, 719 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1999).

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Burke v. Burke, 864 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
    …the trial court erred in awarding all major assets to Former Wife; however, we reverse and remand the distribution to the trial court because of its failure to make written findings of the value of the various assets distributed.”); Green v. Green, 788 So. 2d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Wetzel v. Wetzel, 671 So. 2d 234, 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We remand for reconsideration of the equitable distribution of property. If necessary, on remand the trial court may take additional evidence to make findings to s…
  • Martin v. Earnest E. Martin, 816 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
    …names. The court did not address the $500 loan. The judgment made no determination that either loan was a nonmarital liability, despite a statutory mandate for such a finding. See §§ 61.075(1) & (3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Green v. Green, 788 So. 2d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Segall v. Segall, 708 So. 2d 983, 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“The court’s failure to make findings clearly identifying the marital liabilities and designating which spouse was responsible for each, as required by section 61.…
  • McGee v. Angeline E. McGee, 264 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
    …ss and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.” Applegate, 377 So. 2d at 1152. This general rule applies to appeals of child support awards, such as here, on grounds that the court used an incorrect income figure. Green v. Green, 788 So. 2d 1083, 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The absence of a transcript is ordinarily fatal to such appeals, but an exception applies where the trial court fails to make any findings of fact regarding the parties’ incomes and the appellant makes “a specific cl…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw