DARRIN GODWIN, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2001-07-13
No. 5D01-1282
PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.
788 So. 2d 1137 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the state's response did not resolve the factual dispute regarding the defendant's receipt of the order and the timeliness of an appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

Godwin sought a belated appeal after his Rule 3.850 motion was denied. He claimed he learned of the denial too late to appeal, while the state suggest…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHARP, W., J.

Godwin had filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal of an order of the trial court which denied his motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850. The court denied four of Godwin’s five claims on October 3, 2000, and appointed an attorney to represent him on the first claim. On March 21, 2001, the trial court denied the first ground also.

Godwin asserts he did not learn of the denial of the first claim until April 23, 2001, when his attorney informed him in response to his inquiry, and by that time it was too late to bring an appeal. The state asserts that Godwin received legal mail from the Clerk of the Circuit Court on April 5, 2001, and suggests without any supporting documentation it was the denial order. However, this does not resolve the factual dispute of whether or not Godwin actually received a copy of the order denying the first claim of his motion and, if so, whether or not he received it in time to bring a timely appeal.

Since the state’s response does not resolve the factual dispute, we appoint the trial court as a commissioner of this court to resolve these questions. See Denson v. State, 710 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw