JOSEPHINE SANDERS, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1928-03-01
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
95 Fla. 400 Florida Supreme Court (1928)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court quashed a conviction for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, finding that the evidence presented was legally insufficient to prove the substance was intoxicating.


Holding

No, there was no legal evidence that the small quantity of liquid found in the accused's possession in her home was intoxicating.


Key Quotes

“There is no legal evidence that the small quantity of "liquid" found in the possession of the accused in her home was. intoxicating, therefore, the judgment of conviction should be quashed on certiorari and is so ordered.”

This quote establishes the core reason for quashing the conviction: the lack of evidence proving the liquid was intoxicating.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Josephine Sanders was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor in her home. The sentence was six months imprisonment and a $300 fine, with an addit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

[*401] Per Curiam.

On writ of certiorari it appears that Josephine Sanders was convicted in the court of the County Judge for Marion County on a charge of being unlawfully in possession of intoxicating liquor. The sentence was six months ’ imprisonment and a fine of three hundred dollars, and upon default in paying the fine and costs, an additional six months’ imprisonment. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the circuit judge. It is certified by the trial judge that the record contains all the evidence adduced at the trial. There is no legal evidence that the small quantity of “liquid” found in the possession of the accused in her home was. intoxicating, therefore, the judgment of conviction should be quashed on certiorari and is so ordered. Haile v. Bullock, 83 Fla. 538, 91 South. Rep. 683.

Judgment quashed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw