SANDRA A. HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL MIGLIORE, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2001-07-05
No. 4D00-3309
POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
789 So. 2d 477 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The mother complains that, in denying her petition for modification to permit her to relocate with the parties’ children and new husband, the trial court refused to consider the increased salary and benefits her new husband would gain by relocating. To the contrary, the trial court considered all of the evidence, and in a very thoughtful opinion explained exactly why it found that the move was not in the children’s best interests. The trial court concluded that the benefits of the move to the mother and her new husband did not outweigh the detriment to the father/child relationship. See Flint v. Fortson, 744 So. 2d 1217, 1218-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Malvinni v. Malvinni, 802 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Harris v. Migliore, 789 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Flint v. Fortson, 744 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). GUNTHER, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.…
  • van Asten v. Costa, 874 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …the court found was extremely important in the children’s lives. The trial court considered each factor under section 61.13(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2002), and there is sufficient competent evidence to support the findings. See Harris v. Migliore, 789 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (denying relocation despite increased salary and benefits to former wife’s new husband where those benefits did not outweigh detriment to father/child relationship); Flint v. Fortson, 744 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (denying…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw