MARK ALVAREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2001-07-05
No. 4D00-3710
POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
789 So. 2d 479 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Mark Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Alvarez was convicted of one count of burglary with an assault and one count of robbery with a firearm. On each count, he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 10 years as a habitual violent felony offender and 15 years as prison releasee reoffender. We reverse because appellant’s sentences imposed pursuant to both the habitual violent offender and a prison releasee reoffender, are not authorized under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act. See Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Because the court was not authorized to impose sentences as a habitual felony offender with greater sentences as a prison releasee reoffender, we strike the habitual offender designation. See Grant, 770 So. 2d at 659.

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Massie v. State, 947 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
    …PRR sentence serves as a minimum mandatory. See Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000). However, the HVFO sentence must be longer than the PRR sentence, as equal concurrent sentences are in violation of the PRR Act. Id. at 659; Alvarez v. State, 789 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The trial court did not provide record attachments refuting appellant’s claim. The summary denial of the motion was, therefore, improper. See Tompkins v. State, 872 So. 2d 230, 238 (Fla.2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d). We, a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw