J.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Valdes-Fauli v. Gonzalo F. Valdes-Fauli, 903 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …erhaps true in this very case, trial judges seem to be forbidden even the right to the expression of ordinary human discourse and banter in the course of performing their duties. See Copiers Int’l, 825 So. 2d at 438; Vivas v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Don King Productions, Inc. v. Chavez, 768 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Begens v. Olschewski, 743 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Roy v. Roy, 687 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). [*219] Even more, I am concerned with the growin…
• Kopel v. Bernardo Kopel, 832 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …erhaps true in this very case, trial judges seem to be forbidden even the right to the expression of ordinary human discourse and banter in the course of performing their duties. See Copiers Int’l, 825 So. 2d at 438; Vivas v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Don King Productions, Inc. v. Chavez, 768 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Begens v. Olschewski, 743 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Roy v. Roy, 687 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Even more, I am concerned with the growing acc…
• Molina v. Perez, 187 So. 3d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …1, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). In reviewing a petition based upon comments made by the trial court, “the standard is the reasonable effect on the party seeking disqualification, not the subjective intent of the judge.” Vivas v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 1252, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (quoting Brofman, 703 So. 2d at 1192), (emphasis added). In this case we agree with the petitioner that the alleged comments could reasonably have caused her to “fear that she would not receive a fair trial.” As stated in…