RODERICK D. BURGESS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Roderick D. Burgess, has raised in his June 18, 2001, application for writ of habeas corpus the same claims previously raised and rejected by this court in closed case numbers 4D01-1219 and 4D00-4024. This latest application is procedurally barred and constitutes an abuse of the judicial system. It is therefore denied. We hereby prohibit petitioner from filing any pro se petition or appeal in this court which raises the same issues raised herein. If petitioner violates this prohibition, he will face sanctions. See Prince v. State, 719 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1999).
WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dinuro Invs., LLC v. Felisberto Figueira Camacho, 141 So. 3d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…nly injuries inflicted upon the corporation.”). Conversely, other Florida cases ruling on this issue have ostensibly stated the two-prong standard and then based their holding solely on the “special injury” test. See, e.g., Chemplex Fla. v. Norelli, 790 So. 2d 547, 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“The [plaintiffs’] allegation that they were harmed individually is not itself conclusive without additional factual allegations showing their injuries were separate and apart from those of other shareholders.”); Salit v. R…
-
Strazzulla v. Riverside Banking Co., 175 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…So. 2d at 207 (holding “stockholders may bring a suit in their own right to redress an injury sustained directly by them individually and which is separate and distinct from that sustained by other stockholders.”); see also Chemplex Fla. v. Norelli, 790 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). A shareholder may bring an individual action as an exception to the two-prong test where there is a separate statutory • or contractual duty owed by the wrongdoer to the individual shareholder. See Braun v. Buyers Choice Mortg.…
-
Carnival Corp. v. Iscoa, 922 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…2d at 519; Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. [*361] Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097, 1099 (Fla.1987)(stating “we cannot agree that certiorari is a proper vehicle for testing denial of a motion to strike a claim for punitive damages”); but see Chemplex Fla. v. Norelli 790 So. 2d 547, 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (granting certiorari and quashing an order granting leave to amend to state a claim for punitive damages because a “plaintiff in a shareholder’s derivative action against officers and directors of corporation cannot recover…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Donnie Lee Prince v. State, 719 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)