JOSE R. CONTINO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE R. CONTINO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
790 So. 2d 576
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Richardson, 785 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(Defendant not entitled to relief on claim that plea entered before 1989 should be set aside, because he was not made aware of immigration consequences, where there is no claim that he received misadvice from his counsel regarding immigration consequences.)
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Evelio Rodriguez-Grave v. State, 847 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…h respect to pleas entered prior to the change in rule 3.172”); see also Perdomo v. State, 837 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Orellanes v. State, 790 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Diaz v. State, 790 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Contino v. State, 790 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); State v. Paniagua, 789 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Del Pino v. State, 785 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Affirmed.…
-
Saunders v. State, 804 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999); Coleman v. State, 790 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Richardson, 785 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)