DAVID BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID BROOKS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
790 So. 2d 604
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, J.
Pursuant to the mandate in Brooks v. State, 787 So. 2d 831 (Fla.2001), we reconsider our previous opinion, Brooks v. State, 753 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), in light of Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2000), and reinstate Brooks’ habitual offender enhancement sentence.
COBB and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000)
- State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000)
- Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000)
- McKNIGHT v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2000)
- Brooks v. State, 753 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- Newsome v. State, 787 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2001)