DOUGLAS ISOM, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2001-07-12
No. SC00-724
WELLS, C.J, and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
790 So. 2d 1092 Florida Supreme Court (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District’s decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J, and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Isom v. State, 800 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …original sentencing court considered a guidelines scoresheet indicating that it knew it was departing from the guidelines. . Review of this case was granted by the Supreme Court and thereafter dismissed as improvidently granted. See Isom v. State, 790 So. 2d 1092 (Fla.2001).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw