PATRICIA ACREE, APPELLANT,
v.
BEN'S LAWN SERVICE, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A jury's award of zero damages is improper when the jury finds that the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff some damage.
Following a jury trial where negligence was found, the jury awarded zero damages to the plaintiff despite finding the defendant's negligence caused lo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Inadequate Verdict cases and more on FLexlaw
BLUE, Acting Chief Judge.
Patricia Aeree appeals the final judgment entered for Ben’s Lawn Service, Inc., on her claim for personal injury. Because we conclude that the trial court erred by failing to grant Ms. Acree’s motion for a new trial as to damages, we reverse and remand for a new trial on damages only.
This case arises from a personal injury action following an automobile accident. Following a jury trial, the jury found that there was negligence on the part of Ben’s Lawn Service, Inc. (Ben’s) that caused loss, injury or damage to Ms. Aeree. The jury apportioned 13% liability to Ben’s and 87% to Ms. Aeree. The jury then awarded zero damages. Ms. Aeree moved for a new trial, arguing that a zero damages award was improper in light of the damages suffered due to the apportioned negligence of Ben’s. The trial court denied the motion and entered final judgment in favor of Ben’s.
A motion for a new trial is the proper method by which to challenge an inadequate verdict. See Cowen v. Thornton, 621 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). “Generally, a plaintiff cannot be awarded zero damages when he has suffered some damages from the negligence of the defendant.” Cowen, 621 So. 2d at 687 (citations omitted). Because the jury clearly found that Ms. Aeree had suffered damages due to the negligence of Ben’s, the verdict of zero damages is inadequate. Because the jury’s decision on liability was not an issue on appeal, we reverse for a new trial on damages only.
Affirmed as to liability, reversed as to damages and remanded.
WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…rt affirmed with an opinion which indicated that Brown could seek a renewed rule 3.850 motion raising the same grounds because the petition had been misplaced by the clerk of the circuit court and therefore could not be reviewed. See Brown v. State, 790 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).…
-
Pugh v. State, 793 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…in the hope that the State could assist the clerk in locating an accurate copy of the missing pleading. Unfortunately, the motion could not be located, and this court cannot properly review the matter without an adequate record. See Brown v. State, 790 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to Pugh’s right to file another motion concerning the same issues with the trial court. Affirmed. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT…
-
Errol D. Brooks v. State, 789 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…ks, our affirmance is without prejudice to Brooks’ right to file a renewed motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) raising the same grounds within thirty days from the date of the mandate. Such motion shall not be considered successive. See Brown v. State, 790 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Affirmed. [*1168] THREADGILL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, Concur. . The trial court's order specifically states that it is considering Brooks’ motion to correct an illegal sentence pursu…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cowen v. Thornton, 621 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)