ENRIQUE VALDES, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL MOORE, SEC., F.D.O.C., APPELLEE
ENRIQUE VALDES, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL MOORE, SEC., F.D.O.C., APPELLEE
791 So. 2d 505
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant to file a notice of appeal when a final order of dismissal is rendered in the lower tribunal. See Medberry v. O’Neill, 766 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
ERVIN, MINER, and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sarasota Cnty. v. BOW Point ON the Gulf Condo. Developers, LLC, 974 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…The use of special magistrates instead of boards is authorized by section 162.03, Florida Statutes (2005). Under section 162.03(2), the special magistrate enjoys the same status as the code enforcement board. See Richbon, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, 791 So. 2d 505, 506 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (referring to "special masters,” the term used in earlier versions of the statute). . Review of a code enforcement board’s order is by appeal to the circuit court. §§ 26.012(1), 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. R.App. P.…
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Medberry v. D.T. O'Neill, 766 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)