JEFFREY THERCUY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEFFREY THERCUY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
791 So. 2d 535
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chapman v. Nationsbank & Royal & Sunalliance Ins., 872 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…etween physician opinions once the claimant has requested an EMA. If there is conflict or contradiction on any material aspect of the experts’ medical or psychological opinions, the JCC must appoint an EMA. See, e.g., Horticulture Plus, Inc. v. Ash, 791 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (reversing denial of motion for EMA, for the reason that appointment of an EMA is mandatory when there are conflicting medical opinions regarding causation); City of Inverness v. Volmar, 768 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (rever…
-
AA Gutter Cleaning, Inc. v. Cesario, 49 So. 3d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…rred as matter of law in his interpretation of section 440.13(9), we reverse the denial of the request for appointment of an expert medical advisor, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Horticulture Plus, Inc. v. Ash, 791 So. 2d 535, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (reversing a determination that, as matter of law, section 440.13(9)(c) did not apply, and remanding because the judge failed to make a determination as to whether a factual disagreement existed between health care providers…
Authorities Cited
- Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)