CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
95 Fla. 697
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the final order of the Circuit Court denying validation of the bonds be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of the opinion in the case of Dade County v. The State, decided March 14, 1928.
Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Dry Cleaning & Laundry Bd. v. Econ. Cash & Carry Cleaners, Inc., 143 Fla. 859 (Fla. 1940)…the rights of citizens. The Constitution does not contemplate that essential governmental powers or authority may be exercised by one not a duly commissioned officer. See Dade County v. State, 95 Fla. 465, 116 Sou. 72; City of Miami Beach v. State, 95 Fla. 697, 116 Sou. 480; State [*873] ex rel. Swearingen v. Jones, 79 Fla. 56, 84 Sou. 84, and McSween, et al., v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board, et al., 97 Fla. 749, 122 Sou. 239, 65 A. L. R. 508, in which it was said: “The powers and duties conferred upo…