GRY B. SULLIVAN, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL V. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE
GRY B. SULLIVAN, APPELLANT,
PAUL V. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE
791 So. 2d 1119
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm under the principles of Apple-gate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979) because the record does not contain the transcript of the trial court’s proceedings. Although we are cognizant of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(f)(2), the appellee in his answer brief specifically pointed out that the transcript was not contained in the record. “Where, as here, the appellees point out the deficiency in the record in their brief and appellants do not move to supplement the record, this court takes the position that compliance with rule 9.200(f)(2) has been waived.” Cirillo v. Davis, 732 So. 2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McHOLDER v. State, 917 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…stablished that the drugs were sold near named church that regularly conducted religious services where officer testified that there was a “regular church” that conducted nightly services as well as Sunday daytime masses); see also Jenkins v. State, 791 So. 2d 1119, 1119-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (finding that testimony that sale occurred within 158 feet or less of Salem Haitian Lutheran Church and that religious services were regularly conducted at the church was more than sufficient to overcome any vagueness ch…
-
PT Cap. Invs., LLC v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 262 So. 3d 269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 791 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). BERGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.…
-
PT Cap. Invs., LLC v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Cirillo v. Davis, 732 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)