JOSE ALBERTO MANITO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE ALBERTO MANITO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
791 So. 2d 1255
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence of the trial court, but remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to enter a written order of revocation of probation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. The defendant’s presence is not required for the amendment of the written order of revocation of probation.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Craig v. State, 921 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…and affirm the same. We do, however, agree, as properly conceded by the State, that this case must be remanded to the trial court solely for the entry of a written order of revocation in accordance with its oral pronouncements. See Manito v. State, 791 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Allen v. State, 780 So. 2d 346 (Fla. [*38] 3d DCA 2001); McCloud v. State, 653 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Manuel v. State, 564 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). For this task, appellant’s presence is not required. Affirmed, bu…