THE STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., H. LESLIE QUIGG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
HENRY R. CHASE, SHERIFF OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND HIS DEPUTIES, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1928-04-17
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown . and Buford, J. J., concur.
95 Fla. 757 Florida Supreme Court (1928) Caution
Cited by 37 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown . and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (19 total)

  • Palmes v. State, 397 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1981)
    …nfession ... that the court may determine its admissibility and the jury consider its value,” the error is harmless where substantially the same matters are presented to the jury through testimony of the same or some other witness. Denmark v. State, 95 Fla. 757, 761, 116 So. 757, 759 (1928); Baker v. State, 30 Fla. 41, 11 So. 492 (1892), overruled in part, Tipton v. State, 97 So. 2d 277 (Fla.1957). At trial appellant testified that he went to the apartment he shared with Jane Albert on the afternoon of Mo…
  • Grant v. State, 171 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1965)
    …reasonable doubt. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed. It is so ordered. DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents with Opinion. THORNAL, J., dissents and agrees with THOMAS, J. . See Denmark v. State, 95 Fla. 757, 762, 116 So. 757, 759 (1928): “It is fear of material or physical harm, or hope of material reward, which renders a confession inadmissible. * * * A confession voluntarily made, but procured by artifice, falsehood, or deception, is admissible.” Ac…
  • Wyche v. State, 987 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 2008)
    …ere no threats or show of force, and the officers told her twice that she could decline to consent). POLICE DECEPTION OR MISREPRESENTATION This Court and other courts have held that not all deception will invalidate a confession. Denmark v. State, 95 Fla. 757, 116 So. 757, 762 (1928); see also Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 301-02, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966) (holding that defendant’s statements made to an [*37] informant were admissible even though the informant lied about his identity);…

Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw