WALTER G. MATHES, APPELLANT,
v.
E. A. ROBERTS, APPELLEE
WALTER G. MATHES, APPELLANT,
E. A. ROBERTS, APPELLEE
95 Fla. 851
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said degree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Houck v. State, 421 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…, and he was convicted and sentenced. Although Houck raises several points on appeal, only those relating to the trial court’s conduct of the suppression hearing merit discussion. An unsworn witness is not competent to testify. Crockett v. Cassels, 95 Fla. 851, 116 So. 865 (1928). Section 90.605, Florida Statutes (1981), requires that “each witness shall declare that he will testify truthfully, by taking an oath or affirmation .... ” (emphasis added). The only excep [*1116] tion made by this statute is fo…
-
Pena v. Rodriguez, 273 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…ach witness shall declare that he or she will testify truthfully, by taking an oath or affirmation . . .”); Houck v. State, 421 So. 2d 1113, 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (“An unsworn witness is not competent to testify.”) (citing Crockett v. Cassels, 95 Fla. 851, 116 So. 865 (1928)). 3 842 So. 2d 168, 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citations omitted); see Turnier v. Stockman, 139 So. 3d 397, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“We review the trial court’s final judgment establishing a parenting plan for an abuse of discr…
-
Anderson v. State, 134 Fla. 290 (Fla. 1938)…tiling of the information; that the affidavit as made and filed before the Justice of the Peace, supra, would and could not meet the requirements of the law and that the information based thereon is void ab initio. Counsel cites Crockett v. Cassels, 95 Fla. 851, 116 So. 865; Campbell v. State, 92 Fla. 775, 778, 109 So. 809; White v. State, 126 Fla. 760, 171 So. 809. Section 24 of Article V of the Constitution of Florida makes provisions for and establishes the method for the creation of a Criminal Court of…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence