KAKKATTU AUGUSTINE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
VANGUARD INSURANCE CO., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-05-30
No. 3D00-1632
Before LEVY, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
793 So. 2d 998 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no distinction between the class certification sought in this case and the certifications approved in Republic Ins. Co. v. Heikes, 741 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); and Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Power, 727 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), we reverse the denial of class certification.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Heikes v. Republic Ins. Co., 866 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …tered against the Republic insureds and remand for further proceedings. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions. .Related class actions were also brought against Vanguard and Merrimack. See Augustine v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 793 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) rev. denied, 817 So. 2d 852 (Fla.2002) and Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Power, 727 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). . The computer printout evidenced homeowner policies issued through FIC by both Vanguard and Republic. . In Au…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw