RICKY E. GORDON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2001-09-07
No. 5D01-2247
THOMPSON, C.J., and ORFINGER, R.B., J., concur.
793 So. 2d 1126 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the defendant's sentence was legal because the offenses of conviction are first-degree felonies punishable by life, which are subject to habitual felony offender sentencing.


Headnotes

[1] First-degree felonies punishable by life imprisonment are subject to habitual felony offender sentencing.

[2] Habitual felony offender sentences are not affected by the holding in Heggs v. …

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Defendant was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon, armed burglary, and aggravated stalking, and sentenced as an habitual felony offender. He cla…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.

GRIFFIN, J.

Defendant, Ricky Gordon [“Gordon”], appeals the summary denial of this Rule 3.800(a) motion. Gordon was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon, armed burglary and aggravated stalking in 1997 and was sentenced as an habitual felony offender to twenty years on the first two charges and ten years on the last offense. He claims that his sentence is illegal under Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000) and State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999), because robbery with a deadly weapon and armed burglary are life felonies and he cannot be sentenced as a habitual felony offender for life felonies.

As the trial court correctly points out, Gordon mistakenly believes that robbery with a deadly weapon and armed burglary are life felonies, but, in fact, they are first-degree felonies punishable by a term of incarceration not exceeding life. See §§ 812.13(2)(a); 810.02(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). First-degree felonies punishable by life have always been subject to habitual felony offender sentencing. See Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1992); James v. State, 775 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review denied, No. SC00-2662, 790 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Apr.24, 2001). The trial court attached copies of Gordon’s judgment to confirm the offenses were first-degree felonies punishable by life.

As Gordon was properly sentenced as an habitual felony offender, his sentence was not affected by Heggs, which held that the 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines violated the single-subject rule. See Mitchell v. State, 775 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(habitual offender sentences are not affected by Heggs as such sentences are not guideline sentences); see also Lowe v. State, 786 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)(same). Similarly, since Gordon was not sentenced as a violent career criminal, his sentence was not affected by Thompson, which held that Chapter 95-182, creating the violent career criminal sentencing category, violated the single-subject rule.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and ORFINGER, R.B., J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Burke v. State, 823 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Gordon v. State, 793 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). COBB, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.…
  • …mprisonment. Pickett v. State, 109 So. 3d 841, 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Fla. Stat. § 775.082(3)(d). Robbery with a deadly weapon and armed burglary are "first-degree felonies punishable by a term of incarceration not exceeding life." Gordon v. State, 793 So. 2d 1126, 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Kierce ultimately entered an open plea of guilty to all charges. (Doc. 7- 2, Ex. 6, at 16.) At the plea hearing, defense counsel explained that he had "talked to the state . . . on numerous occasions and there [was] no [p…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw