LUIS SUAREZ, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH MILAGROS SUAREZ, HIS SURVIVING SPOUSE, APPELLANT,
v.
PRINTING COMPANY OF AMERICA AND SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2001-09-13
No. 1D01-2305
MINER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
794 So. 2d 708 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because the order being appealed herein does not finally dispose of the claims raised by appellant’s petition for attorney’s fees and taxation of costs, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.1 This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek review upon rendition of an order establishing the amount of fees appellant is entitled to recover from the employer/carrier for securing the payment of penalties and interest.

MINER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. . Appellant's request to relinquish jurisdiction for purposes of entering a final order is denied. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • M.M. v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 189 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2016)
    …See, e.g., Wilson v. Wilson, 906 So. 2d 356, 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (order dissolving marriage but retaining jurisdiction [*141] over issues such as child support,' child custody, alimony, or property issues is not final); Shaw v. Fla. Steel Corp., 794 So. 2d 708, 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (in a worker’s compensation case, a reservation of jurisdiction to order payment rendered the order non-final and nonappealable); Sunny Pines Convalescent Ctr. v. Walters, 422 So. 2d 1079, 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (in the co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw