MALIK SHARIFE, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, AS SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Confining cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Malik Sharife filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari seeking review of the denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, in which he alleged that his confinement was illegal because he had never been committed to the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections. We deny the petition because his own attachments to his petition below conclusively refuted this claim. See also § 921.16(2), Fla. Stat. (1991). We do not reach any issue eon-cerning whether the State has violated the terms of the plea agreement or whether Sharife should be entitled to withdraw his plea. Those issues may only be raised through a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 claim in the sentencing court. See, e.g., Colon-Morales v. State, 743 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, our denial is without prejudice to Sharife to seek the appropriate remedy in the appropriate court.
ERVIN, MINER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCLOUD v. State, 803 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…entencing scheme to be the maximum penalties set forth in section 775.082. McGregor v. State, 789 So. 2d 976 (Fla.2001), approving Kijewski v. State, 773 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), review denied, 790 So. 2d 1105 (Fla.2001). See Gilson v. State, 795 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(penetration “is merely a ‘sentencing factor’ that the judge considered in his broad discretion to sentence, ‘within the range prescribed by statute ’ ”)(eiting Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348)(emphasis in original). We…1 / 2
-
Thompson v. State, 949 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…Florida Statutes. See Isaac v. State, 826 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Lee v. State, 808 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); McCloud v. State, 803 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Caraballo v. State, 805 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Gilson v. State, 795 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Pursuant to sections 794.011(3) and 775.082, Florida Statutes, appellant’s Count I conviction is a “life felony,” and is punishable “by term of imprisonment for life or by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life impr…
-
Hindenach v. State, 807 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…the Court issued a one paragraph opinion vacating and remanding McCloud1 to the fifth district “for further consideration in light of Apprendi.” See McCloud v. Florida, 531 U.S. 1063, 1063, 121 S.Ct. 751, 148 L.Ed.2d 654 (2001). In Gilson v. State, 795 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this court summarized the current state of the law as espoused in Apprendi as follows: Due Process requires that every element of the crime charged must be proved, to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt. Included within this requ…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Colon-Morales v. State, 743 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)