PASCO COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
ALBERT ANGLE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the Judge of Compensation Claims' findings, holding that the claimant was entitled to benefits as there was competent substantial evidence to support the JCC's finding that the claimant did not intentionally or knowingly provide misleading information.
Appellants argued that the claimant was not entitled to compensation benefits because he intentionally and knowingly provided incomplete or misleading…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Substantial Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
POLSTON, J.
Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is granted. This court’s opinion dated July 10, 2001 is withdrawn and the opinion below is substituted therefor. Appellants contend . that, pursuant to section 440.09(4)1, Florida Statutes, the claimant is not entitled to compensation or benefits because he intentionally and knowingly provided incomplete or misleading testimony under oath regarding his physical activities. However, the Judge of Compensation Claims (“JCC”) found that the claimant did not knowingly or intentionally provide misleading information, and this finding is supported by competent substantial evidence.
The JCC’s finding relating to the claimant’s impairment rating is also supported by competent substantial evidence.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and KAHN, JJ., concur. . The 1998 amendment to section 440.09(4) is procedural rather than substantive, and is therefore retroactively applied to the petition for benefits. Russell Corporation v. Jacobs, 782 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stevie A. Brown v. State, 843 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…as denied on the basis that the investigator’s actions did not constitute an arrest. The appellant also filed a petition for writ of prohibition with this Court. Although the appellant’s petition was denied on procedural grounds, see Brown v. State, 795 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the denial of a petition for writ of prohibition in which a speedy trial claim is raised does not prevent the claim from being raised on direct appeal. See Cappetta v. State, 471 So. 2d 1290, 1291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review den.…
-
Jackson v. State, 801 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…with a firearm. We affirm. Knight v. State, 791 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. granted, No. SC-001987, 796 So. 2d 537 (Fla. September 7, 2001). We certify the same question certified in our opinion on rehearing in Knight. See Johnson v. State, 795 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Bennett v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D1300, — So. 2d -, 2001 WL 530477 (Fla. 1st DCA May 21, 2001). AFFIRMED. BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ„ Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Russell Corp. & Gab Robins v. Jacobs, 782 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)