RONALD B. SPRING, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Sentences for life felonies cannot exceed forty years, and combined incarceration and probation cannot exceed statutory maximums.
Appellant sought postconviction relief, arguing his sentences for life felonies exceeded the forty-year limit and that probation added to other senten…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Ronald B. Spring, appeals from an order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Appellant claims, and the record reveals, that he was sentenced to terms of fifty years incarceration on at least two of the life felonies of which he was convicted. “When a court opts for a term of years instead of a life sentence for a life felony ... it may not impose a sentence longer than forty years.” Kellar v. State, 712 So. 2d 1133, 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
Further, Appellant alleges that he was sentenced to the statutory máximums on a third degree felony and a second degree felony, and that additional terms of probation were added on to the sentences of incarceration, resulting in total sentences in excess of the statutory maximum. Combined periods of incarceration and probation may not exceed the maximum period of incarceration provided by statute for the offense. State v. Holmes, 360 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla.1978).
As Appellant’s claims are not conclusively refuted by the record, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm, without discussion, Appellant’s first, fourth, fifth, and sixth, claims for relief.
ERVIN, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Holmes, 360 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1978)
- Rayl Kellar v. State, 712 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)