SAMUEL HALL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Raphael Cohen v. State, 985 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …ve the charge, the prosecution only called one contractor and one architect to testify at trial. This Court has held that statements alleged to be perjurious must be of “empirical fact” and not of opinion, belief or perception. See Vargas v. State, 795 So. 2d 270, 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). One of the essential elements of perjury in official proceedings is that the person making the statement does not believe it to be true. Id. at 272. The elements of perjury in official proceedings are: 1) making a false stat…
• Kingland Ests., Ltd. v. Davis, 170 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …not be positively attributed to any of the defendants. . See Cohen v. State, 985 So. 2d 1207, 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("[SJtatements alleged to be perjurious must be of ‘empirical fact' and not of opinion, belief or perception. See Vargas v. State, 795 So. 2d 270, 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). One of the essential elements of perjury in official proceedings is that the person making the statement does not believe it to be true. Id. at 272. The elements of perjury in official proceedings are: 1) making a false stat…
• Parris v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)

Authorities Cited

• Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)