J.P., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-10-03
No. 3D00-2087
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
795 So. 2d 278 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. S.B., 758 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • A.C. Harroll v. State, 960 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
    …33, 536 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)(citing Bozza v. U.S., 330 U.S. 160, 67 S.Ct. 645, 91 L.Ed. 818 (1947)(re-sentenc-ing that imposes more severe sentence to correct omitted mandatory penalty does not violate double jeopardy clause)); see also Oce v. State, 795 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(Cope, J., concurring). Affirmed. . Section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006) provides in pertinent part: 948.30. Additional terms and conditions of probation or community control for certain sex offenses.— Conditions imposed pur…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw