STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, APPELLANT,
v.
BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION AND WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANY CROSS-APPELLANTS, V. WILLIAM M. BOWMAN, JR., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was no legal basis to assess attorney's fees against the employer and carrier under the cited statute, and rejected the state's argument regarding the calculation of the social security offset.
The case involves an award of attorney's fees against an employer and carrier, and a dispute over the calculation of a social security offset for work…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Workers' Compensation Offset cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
There was no legal basis under section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (1973) for the assessment of attorney’s fees against the employer and carrier. Therefore, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees in favor of the claimant.
Moreover, we reject the State’s argument regarding the calculation of the social security offset. In Acker v. City of Clearwater, 755 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), we held that the offset should not be recalculated each year to include the yearly increases in permanent total disability supplemental benefits. As we did in Acker, we certify the following question:
WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
In all other respects the order of the judge of compensation claims is affirmed.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.