GUY HARRIMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) asking for additional jail credit to reflect the time he spent incarcerated in Texas. The trial court in denying the motion found “that it should be denied because time claimed by defendant was spent in an out of state jail.” However, the Florida Supreme Court has held that the trial court has discretion as to the award of foreign jail credit. See Kronz v. State, 462 So. 2d 450 (Fla.1985). We therefore REVERSE and REMAND to the trial court to exercise its discretion as it reconsiders the appellant’s motion.
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Krause v. State, 857 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…court’s summary denial and remand with directions for the trial court to exercise its discretion about whether to award the appellant the additional jail credit. See Aller [*344] v. State, 792 So. 2d 692, 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Harriman v. State, 798 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Tyson v. State, 773 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). REVERSED and REMANDED. KAHN, WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…
-
West v. State, 22 So. 3d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…of discretion. 984 So. 2d at 579. We also recognize that we have previously reviewed claims such as Appellant’s on appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion. See, e.g., Krause v. State, 857 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Harriman v. State, 798 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). However, the issue in those cases was whether the trial court had the authority to grant credit for time served in an out-of-state jail, not whether rule 3.800(a) was a proper vehicle for the defendant to seek that relief. Thus,…
-
Miller v. State, 829 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…e discretion to award credit. But Price only applies to cases involving credit for time served in another Florida county. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for reconsideration pursuant to Kronz. See Harriman v. State, 798 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Combs. REVERSED and REMANDED. SHARP, W„ SAWAYA and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur. . Miller cannot argue his plea to the state charges was unknowing in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. Abdullah v. State, 679 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kronz v. State, 462 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1985)