JEFF MORGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a defendant's claim of unawareness of the intent element of a crime is a facially sufficient attack on the voluntariness of a plea, requiring an evidentiary hearing if not conclusively refuted by the record.
Jeff Morgan pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree premeditated murder. He later sought post-conviction relief, claiming his plea was involuntary be…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intent To Kill cases and more on FLexlaw
THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.
Jeff Morgan appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Morgan pleaded to attempted first-degree premeditated murder and was sentenced to 193.4 months in prison. In his motion, Morgan claimed that his plea was involuntary because he did not know that the State would have to prove that he intended to kill the victim. Morgan claimed that he was not attempting to kill the victim when he shot at him but was only trying to scare him.
The trial court determined that the record did not conclusively refute Morgan’s claim that he was unaware of the element of intent. The trial court, however, denied the claim, finding that Morgan’s plea was voluntarily entered with the knowledge that there were available defenses. We reverse.
A voluntary plea requires that the defendant must understand the nature of the charges, which includes knowing the elements of the crime charged. State v. Perry, 786 So. 2d 554 (Fla.2001) (holding claim that defendant was unaware that intent was element of crime facially sufficient attack on voluntariness of plea). Attempted first-degree premeditated murder requires the State to prove that the defendant’s intent was to cause the victim’s death. Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364, 373 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). We agree with the trial court that Morgan’s claim is not conclusively refuted by the record. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.
We affirm Morgan’s remaining claims without comment.
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.
GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Perry, 786 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 2001)
- Jackson v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Wallace v. State, 766 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)