RICHARD JASON COX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICHARD JASON COX, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
799 So. 2d 339
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Richard Jason Cox, the appellant, appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Because they lack merit, we affirm the appellant’s first five claims. The trial court did not address the appellant’s sixth claim. However, as the appellant has now been resen-tenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000), and he does not challenge his new sentence, we dismiss as moot his claim that his prior sentence exceeded the sentencing guidelines maximum range. See Edwards v. State, 780 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hess, 814 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…e of its documents were prepared in anticipation of litigation or protected by the attorney-client privilege, it should have listed the specific documents to which it claimed the privilege would attach. See also TIG Ins. Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that insurer’s failure to prepare privilege log identifying correspondence with attorney resulted in waiver of attorney-client and work product privileges). Although Nationwide states that it submitted a privilege log in…
-
Coates v. Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., 940 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…case as presented to us, we conclude that neither doctrine supports the order compelling discovery. THE “AT ISSUE” DOCTRINE “[W]aiver of the attorney-client and work-product privileges is not favored in Florida.” TIG Ins. Corp. of Am. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339, 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, all personal privileges may be waived by the client. Savino v. Luciano, 92 So. 2d 817, 819 (Fla.1957). In Savino, the Florida Supreme Court articulated the “at issue” doctrine as follows: “[W]hen a party has filed…
-
Harley Shipbuilding Corp. & Howard Harley v. Fast Cats Ferry Serv., LLC., 820 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…al Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 673 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Contrary to Fast Cats’ assertion in response to this petition, this is not the kind of case where preparation of a privilege log is required. Cf. TIG Ins. Corp. of Am. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In TIG the court simply could not decipher whether claims of privilege had been waived by the party seeking protection without the aid of a privilege log. Here, in contrast, fewer documents are involved (responses to four reques…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Edwards v. State, 780 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)