NESTOR A. GARCIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NESTOR A. GARCIA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
800 So. 2d 289
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the burglary conviction of defendant-appellant Nestor A. Garcia.
On the first issue, we reject the claim of error. It does not appear that the argument now made on appeal was clearly presented to the trial judge. See Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978).
As to the defendant’s second and third points, we conclude that the trial court acted within discretion in excluding evidence of claimed prior bad acts by the victim. See Chaudoin v. State, 707 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
We find no error in the scope of the Richardson* hearing and the trial court’s rulings thereunder. Affirmed.
*
Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cooper v. Gress, 854 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…custody”); Zediker, . 444 So. 2d at 1034. The parties’ failure to communicate with each other, without some other material, unanticipated change since the final judgment, is not a proper legal ground for modifying custody. See Perdices v. Perdices, 800 So. 2d 289, 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding trial court abused its discretion in modifying custody based on sole allegation that parents’ ability to cooperate with each other had deteriorated, which did not constitute substantial change in circumstances); Boar…
-
Ogilvie v. Ogilvie, 954 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…ir, 884 So. 2d 1169, 1172-73 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Agranoff v. Agranoff, 882 So. 2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Ward v. Ward, 874 So. 2d 634, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Burger v. Burger, 862 So. 2d 828, 831-32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Perdices v. Perdices, 800 So. 2d 289, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Muniz v. Muniz, 789 So. 2d 370, 371-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Goodmon v. Goodmon, 779 So. 2d 490, 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Young v. Young, 732 So. 2d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Metcalfe v. Metcalfe, 655 So. 2d 1251, 1253 (F…
-
Spano v. Bruce, 892 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…nces since entry of the parties’ visitation agreement that would warrant a change of custody, and that a change of custody would be in the best interest of the child. Mejia v. Rico-Perez, 827 So. 2d 315, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Perdices v. Perdices, 800 So. 2d 289, 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review denied, 821 So. 2d 299 (Fla.2002); Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513, 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Therefore, we affirm the order under review. • Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
- Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1978)
- Chaudoin v. State, 707 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)