CHESTER LEE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• King v. State, 911 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …eal. The motion was denied without any discussion of its merits. Id. at 682 (citations omitted). This court reversed the order of the trial court and remanded the case for consideration of the motion on its merits.2 Similarly, in Jackson v. State, 801 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), this court affirmed the trial court’s order denying Mr. Jackson’s motion for postconviction relief concerning a sexual predator designation. We affirmed, however, without prejudice to Mr. Jackson’s right to pursue any available c…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Renoit Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008)
  …tate, 855 So. 2d 681, 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (ultimately reversing the civil division’s order denying Coblentz’s Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion for relief from judgment challenging his sexual predator designation); Jackson v. State, 801 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (affirming the trial court’s order denying Jackson’s sexual predator designation challenge as improperly raised in a motion for postconviction relief); Jackson v. State, 893 So. 2d 706, 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (ultimately reve…
• Kidd v. State, 855 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …eltz v. State, 818 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (trial court could treat a defendant’s rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence attacking his sexual predator designation as a motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540); Jackson v. State, 801 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (claim that trial court erred in designating a defendant as a sexual predator could not be raised pursuant to either the rule governing motion to correct sentence or rule governing motions for post-conviction relief); Szuch v. Sta…