BERNETTA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed and remanded for resentencing because the trial court improperly rejected Williams's sentencing arguments without allowing her to present supporting evidence at her Heggs resentencing hearing.
A defendant is entitled to present relevant sentencing evidence at a de novo resentencing hearing and the trial court must consider such evidence before rejecting sentencing arguments.
[1] At a de novo resentencing hearing ordered pursuant to Heggs v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Once a circuit court determines that resentencing is appropriate, a defendant is entitled to a de novo sentencing hearing with the full array of due process rights.”
Establishing the standard for Heggs resentencing hearings and the defendant's procedural rights.
Bernetta Williams was resentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State and attempted to argue that her guidelines scoresheet was incorrect because a juvenile ad…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse De Novo Sentencing Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Bernetta Williams challenges the sentence imposed after she was resentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). At her resentencing hearing, she attempted to argue that her guidelines scoresheet was incorrect for two reasons: first, because a juvenile adjudication had been improperly scored as prior record; and second, because victim injury points should have been scored as minor rather than moderate. She was not permitted to introduce evidence on the first point because the court and her own counsel agreed the issue was time-barred. Concerning her second point, although Williams’s counsel did mention the victim’s injuries were minor, no testimony was presented to support his assertion. The court impliedly rejected the argument when it sentenced Williams based on a scoresheet that included points for moderate victim injury. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Once a circuit court determines that resentencing is appropriate, a defendant is entitled to a de novo sentencing hearing with the full array of due process rights. This rule applies to a Heggs resentencing. Webb v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D2198, — So. 2d-, 2001 WL 1040754 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept.12, 2001); see also St. Lawrence v. State, 785 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Williams was entitled to present relevant sentencing evidence for the court’s consideration. Webb. Because the court rejected her arguments without hearing evidence, we reverse and remand for a new sentencing hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
BLUE, C.J., and RAMSBERGER, PETER M., Associate Judge, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- ST. Lawrence v. State, 785 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)