JOSEPH SAWCHUK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2001-12-18
No. 5D01-710
THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.
801 So. 2d 996 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hitchcock v. State, 746 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev. denied, 767 So. 2d 457 (Fla.2000); State v. Simm, 558 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scott v. State, 937 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
    …his case is based only on the grounds raised in the petition. We do not address any other theory that the defendant might raise to avoid prosecution under the second affidavit. We also note that this decision does not conflict with Gilliam v. State, 801 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), where the reference to “the Double Jeopardy Clauses” was dicta. ’ The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur. . If a reversal is based on the weight of the evidence, as opposed to the suffi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw