DAISY G. BISZ AND MICHAEL AND ANN SCULLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-11-14
Nos. 3D00-3211, 3D00-3173
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., FLETCHER, JJ„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
802 So. 2d 385 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Environmental Trust v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, 714 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(“An agency statement explaining how an existing rule of general applicability will be applied in a particular set of facts is not itself a rule.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ponton v. Warden John Willis, 172 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …e, 971 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (affirming denial of motion for postconviction relief), review denied, 984 So. 2d 519 (Fla.2008); Ponton v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (denying petition for writ of habeas corpus); Ponton v. State, 802 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (affirming denial of motion for postconviction relief), review denied, 817 So. 2d 849 (Fla.2002); Ponton v. State, 796 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (affirming denial of motion to correct sentencing error); Ponton v. State, 784 So…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw