LARRY EUGENE CARTER HOLCOMB, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Melton v. State, 908 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …order to the extent that it denies defendant’s claim that his written sentence does not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement. See, e.g., D’Haiti v. State, 818 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 835 So. 2d 266 (Fla.2002); Reddick v. State, 802 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). “When a trial court summarily denies a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), 3.850, or 3.853, this court’s standard of review is as follows. ‘On appeal from the denial of relief, unle…
• Kazi Keno Bowleg v. State, 813 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …, 335 So. 2d 280 (Fla.1976). [*292] However, based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate the sentencing order, and remand for entry of a sentencing order that comports with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Reddick v. State, 802 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Arnold v. State, 754 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Jivanjee v. State, 724 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Affirmed in part; vacated in part and remanded.…
• Griffith v. State, 909 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …count I only. We therefore reverse the order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence in part, and remand with directions to strike the PRR designation from count II. See Reyes v. State, 888 So. 2d 95, 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Reddick v. State, 802 So. 2d 421, 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The defendant need not be present. We affirm the remainder of the order denying relief. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.…

Authorities Cited

• Graddy Robbinson v. State, 784 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)