EDWARD REDDICK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-12-05
No. 3D01-1181
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
802 So. 2d 421 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*422] PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Edward Reddick, filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The record refutes the claims raised by the defendant, and therefore, we affirm the denial of the motion for post-conviction relief. However, as the State properly concedes, the portion of the written sentencing order that provides that the two twenty-five year sentences are to run consecutively does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements that the sentences are to run concurrently. Therefore, we vacate that portion of the sentencing order, and remand for entry of written sentencing order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Alvarez v. State, 698 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw