MICHAEL ANDRE WHITE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-12-26
No. 3D01-1435
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.
802 So. 2d 516 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (holding that to effect an investigatory stop, a police officer need only have a founded suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime); Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that founded suspicion needed to justify investigatory stop is fact specific to each case and based on totality of circumstances as viewed by an experienced police officer); Jones v. State, 758 So. 2d 722, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that “under ‘inevitable discovery’ doctrine, evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful search is admissible if the evidence would ultimately have been discovered by legal means.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw