DIETER DREWING, APPELLANT,

v.

JACQUELINE DREWING, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Casimir v. McDONOUGH, 932 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …Casimir argues that, by allowing the State to call his witness as a State witness, it violated the attorney-client privilege, it is clear that the State’s examination of the witness did not involve privileged information. See State v. Investigation, 802 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). When instructing the jury regarding the charge of criminal conspiracy, the trial court told the jury that before they could find Casimir guilty of criminal conspiracy, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt th…
• Jackson v. State, 202 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …5 (Fla.1976). Id. Petitioner argues that Williams is wrongly decided and complains that, unlike the State, a criminal defendant does not have an investigative subpoena power or the right to have a subpoena remain secret. Cf. State v. Investigation, 802 So. 2d 1141, 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (recognizing that section 27.04, Florida Statutes, allows “the state attorney to issue subpoenas duces tecum for records as part of an ongoing investigation”) (additional citations omitted); see also § 119.071(2)(c)1, Fla. S…
• State v. Diondrick Gibson, 935 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …Bloom, 497 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla.1986). The state attorney “acts as a one-person grand jury in carrying out investigations into noncapital criminal conduct, and the state attorney must be granted reasonable latitude in that role.” State v. Investigation, 802 So. 2d 1141, 1143-44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). The State “clearly has a strong interest in gathering information relevant to an initial inquiry into suspected criminal activity....” Doe v. State, 634 So. 2d 613, 615 (Fla.1994). “A judicial limit to this discretion ar…

Authorities Cited

• S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Wilmott Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1974)
• Klein v. Klein, 551 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
• United Water Fla., Inc. v. Fla. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 728 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)