FERNANDO MARRERO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FERNANDO MARRERO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
803 So. 2d 760
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We grant the motion. As in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Motion granted; question certified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Adderly v. State, 842 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2003)…PER CURIAM. We originally accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Adderly, 803 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. W…
-
Portillo v. State, 211 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…men, or common prostitution”), . See, e.g., Marr v. State, 494 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 1986) (concluding that the trial court properly limited cross-examination of the victim by precluding evidence of the victim’s past sexual activity); State v. Adderly, 803 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (granting the State’s petition for certiorari and quashing the trial court’s order which denied the State’s motion in limine to preclude the defendant from introducing evidence of the victim’s prior sexual activity); Young v. Stat…
Authorities Cited
- Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)