VANDA FROMVALD, AS BENEFICIARY OF AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD O. PETRIES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD O. PETRICS, APPELLEE
VANDA FROMVALD, AS BENEFICIARY OF AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD O. PETRIES, APPELLANT,
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD O. PETRICS, APPELLEE
804 So. 2d 429
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 877 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
DELL, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bishop v. Bishop, 858 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…the existence at the time of the waiver of a right, privilege, advantage, or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Yenke, 804 So. 2d 429, 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). There is nothing in this record to establish that Former Wife intended to relinquish her right to collect child support arrearages by dismissing the enforcement action. Furthermore, as Former Wife correctly points out, the…