STEPHEN PATRICK WOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEPHEN PATRICK WOOD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
804 So. 2d 486
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
THOMPSON, C.J., COBB, ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. Jones, 845 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…o be reviewed. Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(b).2 A motion for rehearing delays rendition of a final order, see Rule 9.020(h), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,3 but only if the motion is timely, see, e.g., Scott v. State, Dept. of Children and Families, 804 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The fact that the former husband did not receive immediate notice of the rendition of the final judgment does not extend the time to file the notice of appeal. See Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Furtherm…
-
Siddiq B.A. Asad v. McDONOUGH, 967 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h), 9.420(a)(2); Scott v. Fla. Dep’t of [*392] Child & Fam., 804 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). All pending motions are denied as moot. KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)