AARON MARSH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-01-23
No. 3D00-3028
Before GREEN, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
804 So. 2d 617 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s involuntary plea claim because “we do not agree that the motion, files and records conclusively show that [defendant] is not entitled to any relief.” Jones v. State, 478 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla.1985); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. This opinion expresses no view on how the merits of this matter should be decided by the trial court.

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary hearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Marsh v. State, 849 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …for his criminal offense because it was based upon clinical evaluations of his present state, and not upon the criminal proceedings). We therefore affirm the order under review. Affirmed. . See § 775.084, Fla. Stat. (2001). . See Marsh v. State, 804 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). . Marsh in fact was released from prison within five months of his plea. . In fact, the following portion of the plea colloquy reveals that the trial court precau-tiously informed Marsh that no one could realistically make any…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw