JOSEPH TOOMA, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2001-12-19
No. 1D00-3684
DAVIS, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
805 So. 2d 50 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1998), we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. The petition is denied.

DAVIS, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Solomon Anthony Drayton v. Moore, 807 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
    …he Florida Supreme Court in Jackson v. Department of Corrections, 790 So. 2d 381 (Fla.2000). . We agree with the Fourth District that a denial of indigency status under section 57.085 is reviewable by petition for writ of certiorari. Knod v. Moore, 805 So. 2d 50, (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Because the trial court also prescreened Drayton’s action and entered a dismissal order, the indigency determination is reviewable in this appeal of the dismissal order. . Drayton’s mandamus petition, with supporting affidavit…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw