WESLEY TATUM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Order cases and more on FLexlaw
FULMER, Acting Chief Judge.
Wesley Tatum appeals from two cases, one involving a violation of community control for several felonies and the other involving new drug charges that he received while on community control. We affirm in all respects except for the written sentence in one case, which we reverse and remand for correction.
The written sentence in case number CRC99-03246CFANO (sale and possession of cocaine) reflects a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment for each count, suspended after two-and-a-half years, with the defendant placed on probation for the remaining seven-and-a-half years. We remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement of concurrent terms of two-and-a-half years’ imprisonment only for both counts, to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in case number CRC98-20798CFANO. Additionally, the probation order entered for case number CFC99-03246CFAN0 must be stricken.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
GREEN and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 870 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…Therefore, consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement, the written sentencing order should be corrected to reflect that the sentence imposed for count two shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed for count one. See Tatum v. State, 805 So. 2d 949, 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Smith need not be present for this correction of sentence. See Windisch v. State, 709 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Convictions affirmed; remanded to correct written sentencing order. [*63] FULMER and WALLACE, JJ„ and…
-
Smith v. State, 870 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…flect that the sentence imposed shall run consecutively to the sentences imposed for counts two, three, and four in CRC01-03019CFANO and concurrently with the sentences imposed for counts one, five, and eight in CRC01-03019CFANO. See Tatum v. State, 805 So. 2d 949, 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Smith need not be present for this correction of sentence. See Windisch v. State, 709 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Conviction affirmed; remanded to correct written sentencing order. FULMER and WALLACE, JJ., and DANA…