THERESA NOELLE PONCE, APPELLANT,
v.
GARY MINDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A mother appeals a paternity judgment awarding primary residential responsibility to the father and challenging visitation and child support orders. The court affirmed the paternity and custody findings but reversed the trial court's denial of retroactive child support, holding that laches and equitable estoppel do not justify denying retroactive support when the mother sought it when the child was seven months old.
The court affirmed the paternity judgment and custody/visitation awards but reversed the denial of retroactive child support. Laches does not apply when the mother sought retroactive support when the child was only seven months old, and denial of visitation rights does not justify denying retroactive support. The matter was remanded for the trial court to determine the appropriate amount of retroactive child support under the statutory guidelines.
[1] Laches and equitable estoppel are not applicable to bar a claim for retroactive child support when the custodial parent seeks such support shortly after establishing pate…
[2] Denial of visitation rights does not justify the denial of retroactive child support.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We conclude that this is not a case of laches when the mother sought retroactive support when the child was seven months old.”
Establishes that laches doctrine does not apply when retroactive support is sought very shortly after the child's birth
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTheresa Noelle Ponce gave birth to a child and later sought paternity and child support against Gary Minda. The trial court awarded primary residentia…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactive Child Support cases and more on FLexlaw
PARKER, Acting Chief Judge.
Theresa Noelle Ponce (the mother) appeals a final judgment of paternity and contests the trial court’s award of primary residential responsibility of the child to Gary Minda (the father). The mother also challenges the trial court order regarding visitation and child support.
We affirm on all issues except the trial court’s denial of retroactive child support to the mother. The father claims that the denial of retroactive support is justified based on laches and equitable estoppel because he expended substantial expenses in finding the mother and establishing his parental rights.
We conclude that this is not a case of laches when the mother sought retroactive support when the child was seven months old. See Johns v. Richards, 717 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (stating that doctrine of laches was inapplicable where the mother filed a paternity petition when the child was three years old, the mother had moved out of state with the child for a year, and the father did not know where they were during that time).
Furthermore, in Gore v. Peck, 26 Fla.
L. Weekly D2481 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.12, 2001), this court held that the denial of visitation rights did not justify a denial of retroactive support.
Therefore, we reverse the denial of retroactive support and remand for the trial court to determine the amount of retroactive support.
For the purposes of remand, we note that section 61.30(17)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that in considering the amount of retroactive support, the trial court shall apply the child support guidelines. In Johns, the Fourth District recognized, however, that under section 61.30(17) the “trial court has discretion to deviate from the guideline amount to assure that the father’s child support obligation is reasonable, equitable, and just.” 717 So. 2d at 1105 (footnote omitted). Section 61.30(17)(b) requires that the trial court also consider the payments the noncustodial parent made during the retroactive period in determining the amount of the retroactive award.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court to determine the amount of retroactive child support to be awarded to the mother. SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bakarania v. State, 867 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…RIAM. Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot. The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated. THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.…
-
C.R. v. State, 60 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…filed, to enter the Disposition Order dated October 18, 2010. Cf. D.C.H. v. State, 42 So. 3d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (holding the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter a restitution order after filing of notice of appeal); Haines v. State, 805 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter an amended order elaborating on reasons for denial of motion for postconviction relief, after filing of notice of appeal, and the amended order was therefore a nullity); S…
-
Duryea v. Bono, 249 So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Johns v. Richards, 717 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Gore v. Peck, 800 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)