EUGENE BLOCKER, APPELLANT,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, APPELLEES
EUGENE BLOCKER, APPELLANT,
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, APPELLEES
805 So. 2d 1034
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Blocker appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeals referee’s decision which found Blocker disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits and requiring Blocker to repay $289 in benefits. Our review of the record in this appeal supports the appeals referee’s finding that Blocker voluntarily left employment without good cause attributable to the employer. Affirmed.
PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Fla. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2003)…, Florida Statutes which deals with suspension of a motor vehicle registration for lack of required security. [n.] Section 5 appropriates $35,000; section 15 provides an effective date. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 805 So. 2d 1034, 1035-36 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). The district court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for Critchfield. The district court found that the subject matter in chapter 98-223, Laws of Florida, involved “driver’s licenses, vehicle registr…
-
Sawyer v. State, 819 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…-degree felony, driving after his license had been permanently revoked, which violates section 322.341, Florida Statutes (2000). He argues that this statute is unconstitutional based on Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 805 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), in which the fifth district held this statute unconstitutional because it was part of Chapter 98-233, Laws of Florida, which violates the single subject rule. We respectfully disagree with Critchfield and affirm. Section 322.34…
-
Lescher v. Fla. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 985 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2008)…Highway Safety & Motor Veh’ls. v. Gaskins, 891 So. 2d 643, 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (noting that by reenacting the statutes effective July 1, 2003, "[t]he legislature cured the defect”); see also Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Veh’ls v. Critchfield, 805 So. 2d 1034, 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ("Once reenacted by way of an adoption act as a portion of the Florida Statutes, a chapter or session law is no longer subject to challenge on the grounds that it violates the single subject requirement.”), aff’d, 842 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence