STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
VALERIE MARTIN, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
VALERIE MARTIN, APPELLEE
805 So. 2d 1050
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Caution
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Hayes v. State, 750 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1999) and Klayman v. State, 765 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We certify the same question as was certified in Klayman.
POLEN, C.J., GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Global Satellite Commc'n Co. v. Sari Sudline and Fernand Sultan, 849 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…l., Solano County, 480 U.S. 102, 108-09, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987)(quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 474, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985)). In [*469] Christus St. Joseph’s Health Systems v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So. 2d 1050, 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), the court noted that Prior negotiations and contemplated future consequences, along with the terms of the contract and the parties’ actual course of dealing must be evaluated in determining whether the defendant purposefu…
-
Canale v. Rubin, 20 So. 3d 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…da. Thus, for example, a corporation with many facilities or activities in Florida has purposefully directed its activities at this state and therefore is subject to suit here on any claim. Christus St. Joseph’s Health Sys. v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So. 2d 1050, 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). General jurisdiction arises from a party’s contacts with Florida that are unrelated to the litigation. See Madara v. Hall, 916 F. 2d 1510, 1516 n. 7 (11th Cir.1990). Specific jurisdiction, on the other hand, requires a cau…
-
Nw. Aircraft Cap. Corp. v. Anastasia T. Stewart, 842 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…002). Section 48.193 provides two categories of personal jurisdiction: specific jurisdiction, conferred under section 48.193(1), and general jurisdiction, conferred under section 48.193(2). Christus St. Joseph’s Health Sys. v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). The second issue involves constitutional analysis which is controlled by United States Supreme Court precedent interpreting the Due Process Clause. This analysis imposes a more restrictive requirement than the statutory analysi…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kathyrn Hayes v. State, 750 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1999)
- Klayman v. State, 765 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)